3
이 json이 통화에 대한 올바른 데이터와 함께 제공되는지 확인하는 간단한 안심 테스트가 있습니다. 나는 안심할 수있는 1.8을 사용하고 있으며 2 가지 다른 버전의 ASM으로 알려진 문제점으로 인해 그루비 항아리를 그루비 항아리로 교체했습니다. 내 json으로 (가) 돌아 오면테스트 실패시 안전 보장 예외
은 다음과 같습니다
{"account":"12345"}
내 코드는 다음과 같습니다
package com.blah.tests;
import org.junit.Test;
import static com.jayway.restassured.RestAssured.given;
import static org.hamcrest.Matchers.equalTo;
public class AccountsTest {
public AccountsTest() {
}
@Test
public void getLocationAccount() {
given().
param("thingAccountIsfor","ABCD").
expect().
statusCode(200).
body("account",equalTo("10")).
when().
get("http://machine:2343/rest/accounts/getaccount");
}
}
나는 이것이 내가 그것을 잘 작동 계정에 대한 기대 값과 일치하는 실행
. 일치하지 않는 값을 넣으면 스택 추적을 얻습니다.log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.apache.http.impl.conn.SingleClientConnManager).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
java.lang.AssertionError: 1 expectation failed.
JSON path account doesn't match.
Expected: 10
Actual: 12345
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:27)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:513)
at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedConstructor.invoke(CachedConstructor.java:77)
at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedConstructor.doConstructorInvoke(CachedConstructor.java:71)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.ConstructorSite$ConstructorSiteNoUnwrap.callConstructor(ConstructorSite.java:81)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallConstructor(CallSiteArray.java:57)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callConstructor(AbstractCallSite.java:182)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callConstructor(AbstractCallSite.java:190)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.ResponseSpecificationImpl$HamcrestAssertionClosure.validate(ResponseSpecificationImpl.groovy:399)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.ResponseSpecificationImpl$HamcrestAssertionClosure$validate.call(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:45)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:108)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:116)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.RequestSpecificationImpl.invokeFilterChain(RequestSpecificationImpl.groovy:759)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.RequestSpecificationImpl$invokeFilterChain.callCurrent(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallCurrent(CallSiteArray.java:49)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:133)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:149)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.RequestSpecificationImpl.applyPathParamsAndSendRequest(RequestSpecificationImpl.groovy:1142)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.RequestSpecificationImpl.this$2$applyPathParamsAndSendRequest(RequestSpecificationImpl.groovy)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.RequestSpecificationImpl$this$2$applyPathParamsAndSendRequest.callCurrent(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallCurrent(CallSiteArray.java:49)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:133)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callCurrent(AbstractCallSite.java:149)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.RequestSpecificationImpl.get(RequestSpecificationImpl.groovy:131)
at com.jayway.restassured.specification.RequestSender$get.call(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:45)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:108)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:120)
at com.jayway.restassured.internal.ResponseSpecificationImpl.get(ResponseSpecificationImpl.groovy:226)
at com.tim.tests.AccountsTest.getLocationAccount(AccountsTest.java:17)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:77)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:195)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:63)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:120)
Process finished with exit code 255
Intellij 내부에서 실행 중입니다. 나는 그루비 한 항아리를 옮기려고 노력했다. 충돌하는 ASM 버전을 내 수업 경로에서 벗어나 다시 실행했다. 나는 똑같은 결과를 얻었으므로 이것은 안심할 수있는 1.8과 함께 제공되는 그루비 한 항아리 대신 그루비 같은 항아리를 사용하는 것과 관련이 있다는 것을 믿지 않는다.
테스트에 실패하거나 여기에 문제가있을 때마다 예외가 발생합니까?